chore: nominate aepfli to the technical committee - #570
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change adds Simon Schrottner to the Technical Committee roster and updates ChangesMembership updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR makes a localized community-membership update for a technical committee nomination, with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining beyond normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
8088c43 to
e7d67e5
Compare
e7d67e5 to
3c73fab
Compare
|
Thank you for this nomination. Looking forward to support this project tin this role even more |
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
e72faae to
175c85c
Compare
Nominating @aepfli (Simon Schrottner) for the OpenFeature Technical Committee. @aepfli has contributed significantly (PRs and issues) across flagd, the SDKs, and org-wide tooling, and has been an active technical leader in the project.
Per the Technical Committee Charter, TC members are elected by a super-majority vote of the existing TC (with a GC veto); consider this the nomination.
@aepfli: please 👍 or approve this PR to signal your interest in this role.